Not intended as a criticism, but a genuine question. Why are you deleting the default constructor for class matrix?
I am reasonably sure that the default constructor is only implicitly created if no other constructors are declared. So deleting the default constructor is at the least unnecessary.
Here is a trivial example:
Which doesn't compile:
Code:
matrix() = delete;Here is a trivial example:
Code:
#include <iostream>template<typename T>class Test{public: Test(T t) { std::cout << t << '\n'; }};int main(){ Test<int> t;}Code:
test_default.cxx: In function ‘int main()’:test_default.cxx:16:15: error: no matching function for call to ‘Test<int>::Test()’ 16 | Test<int> t; | ^test_default.cxx:8:5: note: candidate: ‘Test<T>::Test(T) [with T = int]’ 8 | Test(T t) | ^~~~test_default.cxx:8:5: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 0 providedtest_default.cxx:4:7: note: candidate: ‘constexpr Test<int>::Test(const Test<int>&)’ 4 | class Test | ^~~~test_default.cxx:4:7: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 0 providedtest_default.cxx:4:7: note: candidate: ‘constexpr Test<int>::Test(Test<int>&&)’test_default.cxx:4:7: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 0 providedStatistics: Posted by AndyD — Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:40 pm
